Ted Hull Consulting FYI

Personal Trainers Can Be Overrated

August 12th, 2016

Policy Governance® seemed to be just what the mission agency needed. The board saw the system as a way of having policies which would keep their headstrong CEO on track and in line. The CEO viewed Policy Governance as a way to prevent the board from paddling around in personnel matters, providing its overvalued opinions and generally keeping it out of meddling in minutia.

And so the CEO, along with the board hired me as a consultant. I was expected to write the applicable policies. After all I had done this for other organizations and it should be straightforward. The CEO saw the monitoring reports as a necessary requirement if the Policy Governance system was going to work.  At the same time he saw this as something that someone else (me?) could do and he would just put his signature to them.

Then my lights which were previously too dim to get the picture started to become brighter, bringing this image into focus. My client was seeing the benefits of a personal trainer and a dietician. Both the board and the CEO saw the need for a healthier governance diet and a more robust exercise regimen. It would make them feel less yucky and remove a little of that excess governance flab. And later when others took a look at their governance health indicators, both their weight and their cholesterol would be lower.

Their mistake lay in believing that the diet and exercise program would increase their health. They wanted the benefits of the program without doing any of the work.

Don’t let a governance consultant sell you on your need for improved governance.  Like personal trainers and dieticians, consultants live in a world where we see the need for improvement in governance. In our zeal to see organizations become healthier, we can inadvertently believe we have sold our clients on something they aren’t really buying. Like a compelling late-night ad for the latest piece of exercise equipment, demonstrated by a buffed model, the organization buys the system but with little motivation to use it. Then when their weight goes up, the equipment is blamed.

Before an organization looks to make changes, the board must be convinced that it needs to make changes. Then it needs to be confident that the planned changes will get it where it wants and needs to go. Finally it needs to be committed to the work necessary to follow through on the process of making those changes. 

Once it is convinced, confident and committed, it needs to engage a personal trainer to guide it in reaching its goals.

  • The Pros and Cons of Negative Language in Policy Governance
October 16th, 2018
You love Policy Governance®, except for that negative language requirement. Why can’t one just tell the CEO how to do something? .....
Home
Services
Introductory Policy Governance® Workshop
Policy Governance® Implementation Workshops
Policy Governance® Coaching
Evaluate Your Board Experience
Books by Ted Hull
Testimonials
About Ted
FYI - Ted's Blog
Contact Us
So Your Board Can Better Serve
204.898.6740

Ted Hull Consulting FYI

Personal Trainers Can Be Overrated

August 12th, 2016

Policy Governance® seemed to be just what the mission agency needed. The board saw the system as a way of having policies which would keep their headstrong CEO on track and in line. The CEO viewed Policy Governance as a way to prevent the board from paddling around in personnel matters, providing its overvalued opinions and generally keeping it out of meddling in minutia.

And so the CEO, along with the board hired me as a consultant. I was expected to write the applicable policies. After all I had done this for other organizations and it should be straightforward. The CEO saw the monitoring reports as a necessary requirement if the Policy Governance system was going to work.  At the same time he saw this as something that someone else (me?) could do and he would just put his signature to them.

Then my lights which were previously too dim to get the picture started to become brighter, bringing this image into focus. My client was seeing the benefits of a personal trainer and a dietician. Both the board and the CEO saw the need for a healthier governance diet and a more robust exercise regimen. It would make them feel less yucky and remove a little of that excess governance flab. And later when others took a look at their governance health indicators, both their weight and their cholesterol would be lower.

Their mistake lay in believing that the diet and exercise program would increase their health. They wanted the benefits of the program without doing any of the work.

Don’t let a governance consultant sell you on your need for improved governance.  Like personal trainers and dieticians, consultants live in a world where we see the need for improvement in governance. In our zeal to see organizations become healthier, we can inadvertently believe we have sold our clients on something they aren’t really buying. Like a compelling late-night ad for the latest piece of exercise equipment, demonstrated by a buffed model, the organization buys the system but with little motivation to use it. Then when their weight goes up, the equipment is blamed.

Before an organization looks to make changes, the board must be convinced that it needs to make changes. Then it needs to be confident that the planned changes will get it where it wants and needs to go. Finally it needs to be committed to the work necessary to follow through on the process of making those changes.

Once it is convinced, confident and committed, it needs to engage a personal trainer to guide it in reaching its goals.

Ted Hull Consulting FYI


The Pros and Cons of Negative Language in Policy Governance
October 16th, 2018

What is it Worth for your Organization to Exist?
July 12th, 2018

The Challenges of the Reasonable Interpretation
May 19th, 2018

Never Have a Policy that Includes
March 9th, 2018

Church Budgets Lead to Shortsightedness
January 17th, 2018

What a Board Approves, It Owns
November 1st, 2017

Kinda Using Policy Governance
October 5th, 2017

Is Your Mission Worthwhile and How Would You Know?
September 21st, 2017

What About Term Limits For Board Members
August 9th, 2017

Why Bother Evaluating Your CEO?
June 25th, 2017

Wisely Investing My Time
May 19th, 2017

Is Policy Governance Too Big For a Small Charity?
March 26th, 2017

Why Bother With Board Education? Video
January 5th, 2017

Board Priorities and Policy Governance
December 15th, 2016

Fishtailing is for Losers
September 19th, 2016

Ditch Your Board Executive Committee
August 25th, 2016

Personal Trainers Can Be Overrated
August 12th, 2016

The Difference Between Cost and Worth
April 25th, 2016

Policy Governance and the CEO Evaluation
March 12th, 2016

Two Sides of the Value Coin
February 12th, 2016

FYI - But a Church Board is Different...so Can Carver's Policy Governance® Model Work?
October 12th, 2015

FYI - Policy Goverance Isn't the Silver Bullet for a Church Board
July 21st, 2015

FYI - The Difference Between Owners and Consumers
June 24th, 2015

FYI - A Board is Greater Than the Sum of its Parts
May 18th, 2015

FYI - Policy Governance - A Whole New Game
April 28th, 2015

FYI - The Ten Drawbacks to Policy Governance
March 10th, 2015

FYI - The Features of Policy Governance
February 18th, 2015

FYI - Five Key Words For Effective Governance
January 6th, 2015



Primary Contact
272-3336 Portage Avenue
Winnipeg Manitoba
R3K 2H9
204.898.6740
  • The Pros and Cons of Negative Language in Policy Governance
October 16th, 2018
You love Policy Governance®, except for that negative language requirement. Why can’t one just tell the CEO how to do something? .....

Copyright Ted Hull Consulting All Rights Reserved | Developed and Hosted by M9 Corporation